Ketanji Brown Jackson on Supreme Court ethics and court’s future

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson is the first Black woman to serve on the Supreme Court — and she’s determined not to be the last.
Jackson’s new memoir, “Lovely One,” which will be released Tuesday, chronicles her ascent to the nation’s highest court and is titled after the meaning of her name, Ketanji Onyika. The 53-year-old justice sat down with “CBS Evening News” anchor and managing editor Norah O’Donnell for her first broadcast interview since joining the Supreme Court two years ago, candidly sharing a journey that humbles her. 
“I think there’s a fair amount of attention that comes with being the first,” Jackson said. “And when eyes are on you, you really do want to perform well.”
The high school national speech and debate champion quickly became the Supreme Court’s most prolific questioner among the current justices, and tied Justice Clarence Thomas for writing the most opinions last term. 
She said questioning is a muscle she exercised as a judge on the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, where she authored more than 500 opinions. 
“I wasn’t doing anything different,” Jackson said about transitioning to the Supreme Court, after a brief stint on the federal appeals court in D.C. “And maybe I should have been. But I have questions, and we have a very complicated legal system. And these issues are hard.” 
One of the hardest questions facing the court this year was about presidential immunity, presented in the case known as Trump v. United States. A 6-3 majority (including three justices nominated by former President Donald Trump) found that presidents have immunity for “official acts” taken in office, impacting special counsel Jack Smith’s prosecution of Trump regarding his alleged attempts to overturn the results of the 2020 election. Smith issued a superseding indictment this week that narrowed the allegations against Trump, seeking to shore up the case after the court’s ruling. Trump has pleaded not guilty in the case and denies wrongdoing.
Jackson wrote a dissent when the immunity question was decided in July, warning that “the majority’s ruling in this case breaks new and dangerous ground.”
“I was concerned about a system that appeared to provide immunity for one individual under one set of circumstances, when we have a criminal justice system that had ordinarily treated everyone the same,” Jackson told O’Donnell. 
The justice who was nominated by President Biden has said she cannot “label” her judicial approach as liberal or conservative. Since being named to the court in 2022 as the 116th associate justice in U.S. history, she has joined the majority in 78% of cases. She told O’Donnell she’s working to become a better consensus builder — a skill for which her mentor, retired Justice Stephen Breyer, was known. 
“No one can match Justice Breyer in that skill…” Jackson said. “But I think that’s aspirational. I would like to be better at forging consensus.” 
Jackson quickly found her voice on the Bench, issuing several solo dissents in her first term. The court’s newest member doesn’t shy away from sparring with some of the more senior justices. 
She notably tangled with Justice Clarence Thomas over affirmative action last year, when the court struck down race-conscious admissions policies at U.S. colleges in a pair of cases involving the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and Harvard College. (Jackson recused herself from the case involving Harvard, her alma mater.)
In a concurring opinion, Thomas wrote that Jackson believes “we are all inexorably trapped in a fundamentally racist society, with the original sin of slavery and the historical subjugation of Black Americans still determining our lives today.” 
Jackson told O’Donnell she does not agree with Thomas’ characterization of her views. Jackson said her dissent pointed “out that we still exist in a society in which the gaps that were initially created as a result of slavery, as a result of Jim Crow, exist and that affirmative action, for example, was really a response. It was remedial to try to do something about the gaps that exist in wealth, in education, in health.” 
Jackson would not comment on the backlash Thomas has faced for accepting millions of dollars worth of gifts over two decades — including previously undisclosed luxury travel and lodging from conservative billionaire Harlan Crow. Thomas said he did not believe he had to report the travel under the court’s rules at the time.
Jackson has disclosed receiving about $25,000 in gifts since joining the court (including Beyoncé concert tickets and a flower display from Oprah), as well as the advance for her book, “Lovely One,” of nearly $900,000.
“I follow the rules, whatever they are, with respect to ethical obligations,” Jackson told O’Donnell. “And it’s important in my view to do so. It really boils down to impartiality. That’s what the rules are about. People are entitled to know if you’re accepting gifts as a judge so that they can evaluate whether or not your opinions are impartial.”
The court adopted a formal code of conduct last year amid the fallout over undisclosed trips and gifts given to Thomas and Justice Samuel Alito. But the code lacks any enforcement mechanism, leading some Democrats to push for a stricter policy. 
Jackson confirmed to O’Donnell that she would consider supporting an enforcement mechanism of the ethics code, a move that Justice Elena Kagan endorsed last month.
 “I am considering supporting it as a general matter,” Jackson said. “I’m not going to get into commenting on particular policy proposals. But from my perspective, I don’t have any problem with an enforceable code.”
Mr. Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris have embraced the idea of court reform, including proposals to enforce the ethics code, impose term limits on justices and clarify that there is no immunity for presidents for crimes committed in office. 
Asked by O’Donnell about supporting President Biden’s proposal for a binding code of ethics, Jackson said,  “A binding code of ethics is pretty standard for judges. And so I guess the question is, ‘Is the Supreme Court any different?’ And I guess I have not seen a persuasive reason as to why the court is different than the other courts.”
The public’s opinion of the nation’s highest court has fallen precipitously in recent years and is still near record lows. Fewer than half of Americans say they have a favorable view of the Supreme Court, according to a Pew Research Center survey conducted in early July, when the court wrapped one of its most momentous terms in years, with major rulings on guns, abortion and presidential immunity. 
“It’s very hard to be in an institution that is being so scrutinized in this way,” Jackson told O’Donnell. “But people are focused. And they’re energized. And they are evaluating the structure, and the function of the court. And that’s the way democracy works.” 
With the fight for democracy a top issue in the 2024 presidential race, Jackson said she’s “as prepared as anyone can be” for election-related matters to end up before the Supreme Court. 
Now, the first Black woman nominated to the Supreme Court could witness another historic first — the first Black woman to become president of the United States. 
“I’m going to stay out of politics as Justices tend to do,” Jackson said when asked about Harris. “I think, again, a ‘first’ in general tends to mean progress. It tends to mean that we’ve moved from a situation in which people have been excluded or prevented from achieving and are now in a realm in which everyone can be anything they want to be. And, of course, the goal is to be in a society where we’re no longer recognizing ‘firsts,’ because it’s not necessary. But for now, as we move along, it’s an exciting thing to many people when a new ‘first’ happens, whatever it is.” 
Jackson’s parents, John and Ellery Brown, grew up in the segregated South. The middle-class Miami couple had high hopes for their daughter, even teaching her how to read at age two. 
“They had a sense of perseverance…” Jackson said. “My parents growing up in segregation, it really requires a sense of stamina to continue to try to excel under those circumstances.”  
She recalled what her mother used to tell her: “‘Have you seen this being done before? Has anybody ever done this? Well, if they have, then you can do it, too.’ And that was the mindset that they really drilled into me: You keep going.” 
Jackson writes in her book about striving to replicate the parenting style she grew up with, but when she learned one of her two daughters was diagnosed as autistic, she described what she felt as the need to pivot. 
“I think I was probably harder on myself and harder perhaps on my daughter than I should’ve been,” Jackson told O’Donnell. “It’s like I didn’t really believe that there could have been some sort of neurological issue, and therefore kind of pushed both herself and me.” 
Jackson said she relates to 52-year-old Justice Amy Coney Barrett when it comes to kids. 
“I think Justice Barrett and I are probably the closest in age and life circumstances,” Jackson said. “So we talk a lot about our kids and try to figure out who’s going to school and who’s picking up whom and that kind of thing.”
At home, the joys and challenges of parenting are a feat Jackson has taken on with her partner, Dr. Patrick Jackson, whom she met at Harvard. He described his love and admiration for his wife as “uncontrollable.” 
The surgeon who met Ketanji Brown in a lecture hall said he always knew she would become a Supreme Court justice. 
“When I interviewed to come to Georgetown,” he told O’Donnell, “the chair at the time said, ‘Why do you want to come to Georgetown?’ and I said, ‘Because we need to be in D.C., because my wife is going to be a Supreme Court justice.'”
Jackson always had high ambitions, writing in her high school yearbook: “I want to go into law and eventually have a judicial appointment.” 
When her dream to join the Supreme Court came true, Jackson faced another unavoidable reality: being in the spotlight. But Jackson said her parents’ will, and their mentality to forge on, has helped her to navigate rocky waters on and off the Bench.
“So much of success in life is believing that you can do it, believing that you have the capacity, the intelligence, the ability,” she told O’Donnell. The lesson Jackson said she hopes to pass onto her own daughters is to “dream big and follow through.”  
      See also: 
Web extra: Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson on Supreme Court’s affirmative action rulings
Watch more of Norah O’Donnell’s interview with Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson on “Person to Person,” streaming on Thursday, Sept. 5, at 8:30 p.m. ET on CBS News 24/7 and Paramount+. 
For more info: